Lou Grant: s03 e23 – Guns

A patriot

Oh boy.

That was my reaction to this episode’s title, knowing America’s relationship with guns and the right to bear arms. But this story wasn’t about gun control, despite the programme showing its hand with on, deliberately comic line.

No, this was about something bigger than that, and about something a lot closer to our home, because it was about the IRA, and the ongoing Troubles.

The episode began with a break-in at a gun shop and the methodical theft of eleven automatic rifles, banned from sale but part of the owner’s private collection. His was the positional statement that got slipped in: challenging Rossi’s lack of interest in his position on gun control, his answer was, ‘Like any sane person, I’m against it!’.

The first real giveaway to the story’s true aim came in McKenna’s at lunch. Owner Maggie McKenna (played by future Golden Girl Rue McLannahan) is over from Ireland for the night’s big St Patrick’s Day party, and she’s shaking the collection tin for starving children back there. The wives and children of the men held in prison in the North.

It’s an old story now, swept thankfully to the pages of history and, we fervently hope, confined forever there, but this was about the support given to the IRA by Americans, support in money, support in guns, support in money-for-guns, bought in Los Angeles and smuggled back to the old country. And the programme trod carefully, allowing the Freedom Fighters their say about what they were doing, justifying their actions, their use of force as unwelcome but necessary, as force was the only thing the Oppressor understood, without condemning them in any but a polite, cautious manner.

In its way, it was a history lesson, a pertinent reminder to those of us who lived through those times. There was a reminder of the death of Earl Mountbatten that brought back in an instant where I was and what I was doing when that news broke, in 1979, on Anglesey, and there were two women, housewives and mothers, one Protestant, one Catholic, to recall the Mother’s Peace Process, wanting nothing but an end to fear and death.

The programme allowed those who represented the cause to make their argument a point of principle whilst allowing the viewer to make up their own mind on the extent to which the death of ordinary people was justifiable by any principle. It allowed the supporters to condemn themaselves out of their own mouths via the passionate but unthinking Maggie, at one point relishing the takeover of the North and showing the protestants what it feels like, and at another refusing to even think about how the British could be removed from Ireland without the very real damage a precipitate withdrawal could cause. Yet Maggie would also be the means by which the episode offered its sole hope of minds changing.

First though, there was Francie Fitzgerald (Redman Gleeson), intrduced by Maggie to Lou as a fellw journalist. Francie was one of those easy-going sons of the blarney and it’s to Gleeson’s credit that, whilst playing him to the hilt as an Irish charmer, he kept him the right side of an Oirish caricature. You liked Francie, you’d have a beer and the craic with him any day, but he was the militant, the gun-runner, stealing Lou’s Driving Licence and Social security card to set up a fake, gun-buying identity.

Francie also turned out a target at the last. He had doubts, or so he said, he wanted to resign, or so he said, but you don’t get to resign. Besides, he was too sloppy, known to the FBI and the Police. So a bomb was planted under Francie’s car.

But this was the show’s only serious failing, and that because of what it was and when this was, and what it couldn’t show. Two kids were throwing ball in the garden. One threw it too hard and it rolled under Francie’s car. The other went scrabbling for it. The show underplayed it too much, neither taking you by surprise nor tightening your stomach with tension of the ‘oh no, they’re not going to…’ kind. We didn’t even hear a bang. Just Police sirens, Rossi arriving to see a totalled car, and a far too offhand resigned line from a Detective to tell us the kid was killed. The moment was thrown away.

At least it had its decent aftermath. The epilogue took place in McKenna’s where a drunken buffoon announced Francie’s death in sententious tones of faked regret. Rossi corrected him: Francie got away, to which the buffoon cheered. Lou told him to tell the rest: our barometer buffoon sighed about it always being the innocent suffer in this war, but in the only shaft of light possible, Maggie herself, the unthinking patriot, told him to shut up. And she tok the collecting jars from the tables and put them away in back.

Back in 1980, that was pretty much the only hope anyone ever dared have about the Troubles, that minds be changed, one by one. I thught that the episode suffered from not once giving the viewpoint of the North, coming closest with Art Donovan’s refusal to be co-opted by reason of his Irish roots and making the practical point that the British simply can’t be thrown out bag and baggage on the next boat, much as the simplistic Maggie wanted.

It was a strong and memorable episode, my choice for the best of season 3. It did its best to stay neutral from an editorial perspective, concentrating upon death and misery rather than the politics, and I’ve tried to do the same today. My curse has always been to see the rights and wrongs of both sides in such situations as this, and whilst my instincts always come down against the users of violence, I do know that sometimes it is necesary, in the same way that Hitler and Nazism could, in the long run, only be overcome by blood and destruction. All I can say is that it is complicated and blessed are the peace-makers of every stripe.

I am so glad that this story is, for now at least, out of date.

9 thoughts on “Lou Grant: s03 e23 – Guns

  1. We hope The Troubles are confined to the 20th Century…..but it does seem like re-unification is gaining in popularity–not to mention B****t which creates a border even though an open border is an essential part of Good Friday. If they ever did, though, they’d have a bit of a problem, in that Ireland proper is much richer than the North, which has lagged behind. Similar to East/West Germany.

    1. Just one among the many contradictions implicit in the simpleminded shit-for-brainsness of the B-word, and which, like everything else at present, is up in the air due to cornavirus. If the EU survives, we may not be as eager to be out of it after all…

      Let’s please keep the guns out of it, come what may.

      1. Just seems to play into that line of thinking that if something has problems, the solution is to burn it down rather than fix it. None of the Europeans I know would claim that the EU is perfect, but…… they would claim it has stopped another European war for those in it, and fostered cooperation between European countries. There were, of course, the Yugoslav wars and the Troubles, but otherwise Europe’s been quite calm. Which is good for all of us.

  2. I agree whole-heartedly. And, with respect, Europe needs a collective body to balance between America and Russia. Putin’s been trying to undermine it for over a dacde and so has the moronic neoliberal right. As for us, we’re still living with a swelled-head because ‘we’ won WW2 and we can’ think of anything else and OF COURSE the world is exactly the same as it was in 1945. All the coronavirus stuff is full of war-metaphors, the VBkitzand Dunkirk spirit, and when someone on my social forum asked why, I pointed out that it’s the only thing that ever happened in our country. Oh, and winning the Football World Cup in 1966 of course. Who are these Johnny Foreigners to tell US what to do?

    1. No disrespect taken! Of course every country (or group of countries) should defend itself against Russian aggression. Since that embarrassing loss to Georgia in 2008, they have been building up their military again. And the EU’s been such a big success economically. There’s not another trading bloc that’s been so well integrated. If India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh or South American countries pulled it off they would be just as rich as the EU.

      And if you want to talk xenophobia……well I think the USA might have you beat in that department. Oh lord.

      1. I think what would suit the world best is if the ‘governments’ of Britain, America and Russia and others, definitelt Brazil but these three especially should be completely wiped out by COVID-19.

  3. An interesting fact. The troubles were the catalyst for the UK having so much surveillance technology. They inspired an interest in the subject in a certain young Jonathan Nolan….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.