I didn’t know much about The Question until DC bought the rights to various of the Charlton characters, including all the ones created by Steve Ditko, just in time to kill off their world in Crisis on Infinite Earths. What I saw I liked, which was the plain business suit, the old-fashioned reporter’s hat and the blank face mask. There was something clean and almost austere about The Question’s design, and the absence of any face or expression was strangely interesting.
His proper DC debut was as a guest star in Blue Beetle 5 as straight Ditko, but when Vic Sage got his own series, written by Denny O’Neill and drawn by Denys Cowans, starting in 1988, all but the absolute basics went out the window. It was there is the first line of narration, issue 1’s splash page, the name Charles Victor Szasz.
I know I bought issue 1 when it was first published and I think, but can’t be certain, I bought issue 2. I know I didn’t buy any more, though I did look in the issue where The Question bought Watchmen and mused about Rorscharch. But the series is highly regarded, and god knows, personally passionate work is not ten a penny in mainstream comics despite what all the creators say, so it’s time to have a look and see if I can now be persuaded to agree.
Though I don’t think I spotted the parallel at the time, it’s interesting to reflect that O’Neill chose the same approach to making over The Question as did Alan Moore on Swamp Thing, ending his first issue by ‘killing’ the old character by shooting him in the head. That’s a pretty drastic thing to do.
The first issue makes this its theme. From the splash page onwards it counts down to Sage’s death at midnight. Whilst it’s doing that it’s reinterpreting The Question’s past history by darkening it. In both guises, Sage is a hard man, a nasty bastard. He’s been around, he was an orphan, he’s newly returned to Hub City where he (thinks he) was born. He’s tacking civic corruption, both of him. He’s an adrenaline junkie, a self-righteous cocksure idiot who, at the end of the issue, walks into what he knows is a trap, is easily defeated by martial arts expert Lady Shiva, has the crap beaten out of him by the thugs, is shot in the head and dumped in the river. Where he dies.
No much equivocation there. O’Neill has however already revealed his hand. The bullet’s come out of the back of Sage’s head. It was an air pistol. It’s the get-out.
Because Vic Sage isn’t dead. A combination of improbable things, plus Lady Shiva, saved him. The bullet flattened against his skull, went round his head between bone and flesh and out the back, whilst something called the ‘Diving Reflex’, basically stored oxygen in ultra-cold water, kept his brain alive whilst the rest of him died, until Lady Shiva dragged him out and brought him to his ally, Tot, Aristotle Rodor, scientist. Sage remembers everything that happened to him when he was dead and nothing of who or what he was before he died.
His bastard cynical sense of humour survived, mind you.
Next came the re-make. Moore took four issues to complete that with Swamp Thing but O’Neill was dealing with a more grounded, less fantastic character, and chose a shorter route. The underlying question was why did Lady Shiva save him? This was only to be answered in part, unsuccessfully. Batman turned up to launch a pep talk, in the form of a savage diatribe about Sage’s lack of training or purpose, a dilettante amusing himself. Lady Shiva sends a helicopter to deliver him to Richard Dragon, Kung Fu master in a wheelchair, to deliver purposeful training. When Sage is ready, for now, she turns up to fight and test him. She sees him as driven by warrior instincts that are now trained, Dragon as driven by curiosity. We get no more answer than that.
Still detached from his past, Sage goes home, puts on the Question’s mask again and starts his attack on the corrupt and insane priest behind the drunken Mayor. The arc continued in issue 3, where the action was The Question saving a schoolbus full of children that was to be blown up, showing him still absorbing his lessons, but the wider picture being completed by showing his gorgeous redheaded fellow reporter, Myra Connolly having been forced into marriage with Mayor Fermin on threat of her daughter, in the same orphanage Sage once lived, being harmed. Myra lives in fear but it doesn’t stop her hating her husband, Reverend Hatch and the whole corrupt crew bleeding the city dry.
Meanwhile, Sage is only existing as The Question. His very recognisable alter ego has been missing for months, what with one thing or another and he hasn’t worked out how to come back.
Unfortunately, though Sage goes back to the Orphanage to find little Jackie and take her somewhere safe, he lets being good with the kids lower his guard and she’s taken. She’s taken for ritual sacrifice, a grotesque parody of Genesis 22:2. Showing better control, The Question prevents the sacrifice but refuses to do what any sane man would do in the circumstances, which is to kill the insane ‘priest’, because he will not become like him. So Myra does it herself. The Question does not blame or criticise her. His only words are: better you than me.
Interestingly, O’Neill finished the thread off with a kind of coda, chaos and riot in Hub City, people dealing with the things they deal with, a rape victim who resisted, a would-be rapist who killed himself, a bad cop who might turn good, a vigilante running himself into the ground fighting an unwinnable war and deciding to reappear as the journalist he once was, to try to stem, if not turn the tide.
I’m already well past where I read to before, where I can’t even remember if I bought issue 2. I’m still only intrigued as to where this is going, and I’m not keen on Denys Cowan’s stiff and stilted art, but let’s see how this develops.
First off was a one-off, whose main point seemed to be how nasty O’Neill could make it. Brutal, macho, twisted, unpleasant. And The Question wasn’t much better. For all that he’s absorbed Far Eastern martial arts techniques and their attendant philosophies, O’Neill has him as a cold, closed-off, sarcastic git with overtones of paranoia. A second story continued heavy on the violence, real violence, not superhero violence, whilst developing the background of a city slowly falling to pieces under a drunken and stupid Mayor, deprived of his handlers, with Myra trying to fulfil the role and pull things round. Interestingly, though she remained drawn to Sage, she wouldn’t sleep with him, because she had made vows, coerced or not, and she would not betray herself by breaking them.
Individual issues, individual stories. Linked by what I can only describe as sadism, the desire to inflict pain, answered by The Question, arriving to inflict greater pain, only this time deserved. Issue 8’s villain was, effectively, a deliverer of karma to people who did bad things, who decided not to kill The Question for exposing him, upon hearing how Sage was trying to change himself. The series was now tagged ‘Suggested for Mature Readers’, DC’s new ‘ratings system’ that caused such disquiet and concern among creators.
A new extended story, delving into Tot Rodor’s background, started in issue 9, whose letter column included a long epistle castigating O’Neill for basically retconning Steve Ditko out of his own creation. I was not unsympathetic to the accusation, though I was to the reply, which was a basic fuck-off in veiled terms, insisting on the right of comic book creators to basically rape and gut any character if they think they’ve got a good idea. No such words were used, but the lines were not so closely drawn that you couldn’t easily see between them.
Nobody so far has mentioned that Cowan is drawing The Question with a mullet that would have put Chris Waddle to shame, which is very much not Ditko. Still looks a mess now.
The story then took Sage to the Caribbean island of Santa Prisca, more famous later for being the home of Batman’s enemy, Bane. I found the story unengaging, with too many things happening behind the readers’ back. It suggested that quantum physics was a modern day alchemy and that it could convert a torturer into a saint, neither of which were propositions I could agree with.
But after eleven issues, perhaps I’ve found the key characteristic of the series: it’s unengaging. It’s cynical to the point that even the ‘hero’ is an unpleasant person to read about.
The first year ended with Myra Fermin setting up a secret meeting with Vic Sage to tell him she intended to run for Mayor as soon as His Drunkenness her husband’s term ended and that, as she was going to have to be completely squeaky clean to succeed, she wanted one last fuck before she forgot what doing it was like. After that The Question investigated a nice low-price good housing development that happened to be built on a toxic waste site. More cheerful stuff.
According to O’Neill, the series was about realistic, nasty and grim things going on but also about change. Charles Victor Szazs, Vic Sage, The Question, whichever they are they are about changing themselves, about moving on from being just the biggest badass in town to more thoughtful approaches. Sage is The Question not out of the goodness of his heart or for revenge, but insatiable curiosity. Why is it like that? Does it have to be like this? The philosophy would be more impressive if he spent fewer pages kicking every motherfucker’s head in.
A two part story had The Question buried up to his neck for a whole issue to make a point about honour, courage and strength that, in the end, was left out when the villains, a corps of military nuts, all shot themselves out of indecision.
But I have to applaud the team for issue 15. Someone is killing unconnected black victims. The issue is a cesspit of racist jokes and comments, coming from an out-of-town private eye, a disgusting bigot. He gets to the bottom of the case ahead of The Question, not that he plans to put an end to it. After all, he’s working for a prominent white nationalist bigoted organisation to check if it’s any of their members doing it. Loomis McCarthy is vile. Vic Sage loathes him. But Myra’s rival Mayoral candidate, himself a racist, takes exception and comes to kill Sage, except that McCarthy jumps in front of the bullet to save him and dies instead, just after Sage has taken him down with a verbal lashing. Why did he do it? Why did it have to be him, when Sage hates having this racist die for him? Wisely, we were given no answer, because given the nature of the story it is incumbent upon us, each of us, to come up with our own answer.
But it was followed by a dumbfuck issue featuring two gunrunners calling themselves Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. This ran over into issue 17 which required Sage to fly to Seattle, during which flight he read a copy of Watchman, briefly dreamed he was Rorschach, kept comparing himself with Kovacs, which became a subtle form of denigration towards Moore and Gibbons’ creation, especially as The Question got taken down and had to be saved by Green Arrow.
If you think I’m reading too much into this implied criticism of Rorschach, there was Denny O’Neill’s regular reading recommendation appearing in the letter column every month: where can I find a book titled The Watchmen? Works for DC and can’t be bothered to get the name right…
As for the team-up, Green Arrow kept The Question tied up for half the issue because he didn’t trust him, then The Question showed off in front of him by continual quotes from Sun Tze. People like the philosophising in this series: I’m finding it boring.
These last couple of issues related to plastic guns and issue 19 brought the manufacturer on stage, offering contributions to Myra’s campaign and factories, jobs and tax dollars to Hub City. In return for being left alone. Alexander Polys was a plastic obsessive and The Question not only got him publicly linked to the erstwhile ‘Butch Cassidy’ but privately linked him to Myra’s campaign manager and ran him out of town. Meanwhile, Myra independently changed her mind and refused Polys’ support on moral grounds: I know this is 1988 and not 2022 but how the hell is the woman ever going to get elected with attitudes like that?
Issue 20 saw the first change in the creative team. O’Neill, Cowan and Rick Magyar had consistently produced 19 issues but Magyar took over full art for this issue. All issues of The Question are nasty and brutish, drenched in a cynicism that paints even the good guys as irremediably flawed, but this was a particularly nasty story about three dimwits whipped up by a right wing politician to commit murder out of self-righteousness. Maybe the parallel to the present day in Britain was too much for me.
The first Annual appeared in 1988, contemporaneously to issue 20. This was drawn by the Cowan/Magyar team, thus explaining the penciller’s absence from the monthly issue. The story brought back some thugs from the opening arc, plus Lady Shiva, who was recruiting a team of three to escort the aged O Sensei home to fulfil a promise made to his wife, eighty-eight years earlier, that his bones would rest next to hers. The rest of the team were Batman and Green Arrow though Vic, who was pretty useless compared to the others, having to have his life saved several times, talked Batman out of joining the mission because he made The Question redundant, and Vic needed to feel useful. There was a twist ending that you could see coming a mile off, turning failure into, if not success then non-failure. The overall effect was less than stellar.
The artistic juggling required to balance out work on the Annual saw Dick Giordano ink issue 21. It combined a people-are-all-shit High School Reunion, a misread date with a background character whose name still wasn’t given and a hospital drama harking back to a story a year ago that I couldn’t be bothered to look up. Denny O’Neill was a major writer but this was not evidence for that status.
Finally, the Mayoral Election came round next issue. The new series inker was Malcolm Jones III, who is first in line to blame for making Myra Fermin unrecognisable. It was a multi-parter revealing that Myra was way behind in the polls, hadn’t a chance and anyway her rich, bigoted opponent had had the new voting machines fixed. In order to get to the bottom of things, The Question had to spend page after page in investigation… whoops, no, I actually meant beating people up. More punching and kicking followed in part 2, leavened by moral qualms about whether it’s right to use savage tactics against the savage: wouldn’t a system that needs that kind of brutality to survive be better left to crash completely in hope that the good guys can clear away the rubble and the broken bodies after and start from scratch? I could have answered that succinctly before a broken and bleeding Tot Rodor reminded Sage that the bad guys might be the ones who survive, but I would have added that they’re the ones most likely to. As Woody Allen put it, the Lion and the Lamb shall lie down together but the Lamb won’t get much sleep.
We finally got the result in issue 24. First though The Question’s been doused in gasoline and is about to be immolated, but O’Neill’s been trailing a weather warning of a tornado throughout the last two issues and now it picks up a motorbike, throws it through a window and hits the guy with the match, putting it out. I’m going to leave you to think about that particular get out clause for yourself.
Anyway, the tornado was long enough to fill half the issue. Tot, estimated as having a fifty-fifty chance of surviving the beating he’d received turned up back at home next day, completely healed and tending to Sage’s minor injuries. The Election was over and the bigot Dinsmore won, by one vote, that being the vote Sage didn’t register for Myra.
But, as was foreshadowed at the start of issue 22, there was another get-out clause. Dinsmore’s car had gone into the river with him in it, and there was a little known provision in Hub City, based on the Mayoral Election of 1866 which favoured a much earlier Dinsmore, if the elected Mayor dies before taking office, the job goes to the runner-up, so Myra got elected after all. Yay, honesty! I’m not impressed.
That wasn’t the end. It turned out Myra didn’t want the job, in fact hated having won. But win she had and replaced her drunken sot of a still-husband who, as also heavily foreshadowed by his constant references to Jack, Bobby and Martin (for the youngsters, Kennedy, Kennedy and King), pulled out a gun during her acceptance speech and shot her through the chest. Sigh.
That brought us to issue 25. No-one tries to stop Fermin or get the gun off him until after he’s delivered an insane, drunken rant and shot Myra a second time, at point blank range, in the back. The first person to step forward is one of Sage’s TV colleagues, who gets his brains blown out after which a paunchy, smashed out of his mind, incoherent and unco-ordinated middle-aged man who’s lived solely on booze for at least a year gets away unseen. Oh, and Myra’s not dead, actually. I know that there are certain conditions of melodrama upon which comics are dependent but for fuck’s sake this is absolute bullshit. Not even a quote from one of my favourite poems, W.B. Yeats’ ‘The Second Coming’, could redeem this for a second.
It’s all because Sage’s got to bring Fermin in himself, after a torrent of destruction, but because this isn’t your conventional series despite everything O’Neill is doing with it that’s pure convention, he doesn’t get him and His Honour dies in a drunken shoot-out with a pair of thugs who have taken two old women hostage, probably killed them too, and goes out an apparent ‘hero’.
Do I really have to reread the remaining twelve issues of this series?
There were two guests in issue 26. One was The Riddler, being interpreted as a clueless no-mark and the other was artist Bill Wray, who was also a clueless no-mark: that was professional art? But the next issue was seriously strange. A third of it was The Question wandering the streets, getting involved in a fight and teasing us with the expectation that, just as Steve Ditko had once done, he would let a thug fall from a building roof. Another third was a visit from Tot Rodor’s cousin, a WW2 comic book artist on a Captain America knock-off, the third third being crudely written and drawn ‘excerpts’ from one of his comic books.
The weird bit was that Alvin Rodor believed that he and his fellow comic book artists had literally won the War with those comics. It tied in with a Congo pygmy tribe’s shaman who, before the tribe hunted, drew a picture of the desired prey that then had an arrow fired into it: every time the tribe returned with the prey, killed by an arrow in the exact place as in the picture. Germany and America didn’t have comic books so…
The idea was fanciful and I don’t know if it has any factual basis. My rationality argues against it yet it was a plausible tale. The seriously weird bit was when, out of the blue in this dark, gritty and realistic setting O’Neill has conceived, Sage has Alvin re-draw a page of his old comic, where the superheroine Betsy Ross is revived by injection with an antidote against zombiedom, only with Myra Fermin’s face substituted. And, in direct contravention of everything the series has been about, she wakes up from her coma.
Round about this time the second Annual appeared. It was the first half of a two-part team-up with Green Arrow, concluded in the following month’s Green Arrow Annual, which I don’t have access to. Since most of this Annual was again drawn by Bill Wray, I am not so cut up about only reading half the story as I might otherwise have been. It included a lengthy flashback revised origin drawn by Shea Anton Pensa, whose art was just as crude, fitting for a story in which Sage was nothing but an absolute bastard.
The only thing worthy of comment in the story was that the villain had developed a gas, that he was going to test in Hub City, that would remove all the evils of the city, the corruption, the violence, the exploitation, all the things Sage and The Question are knocking themselves out trying to stem, by making them docile, placid, suggestible. In short, effectively lobotomising them. Green Arrow rejected it instantly in disgust. The Question took it seriously as a solution.
Now I’m not going to say anything more than that because I don’t have the rest of the story and Sage will inevitably reject the idea, but I wasn’t at all impressed that he would even so much as flirt with it. What is a superhero about if not individualism? Individual action, individual thought. It’s the single most intrinsic element of their DNA code, just as controlling others, even for their own ‘good’ is hardwired into supervillains. It’s a secular blasphemy and to touch pitch is to be forever defiled.
Back at the main series, Myra’s awake again but Vic has retired Sage and prefers to be The Question near full-time because he’s relishing kicking butts, whilst Lady Shiva’s in town and town has gone to hell, and is being allowed to disintegrate even further, even though it’s already past that well-known Point, just to see what happens when an entire city departs from civilisation. The wallowing in thuggishness is boring me.
Needless to say The Question and Lady Shiva had to fight, amid rumours that the book was facing cancellation, denied as ‘ugly’ and ‘wrong’. Never believe denials on letters pages. Shiva was disappointed that Vic had gone downhill since Richard Dragon’s teaching but the point became moot when her ’employer’s gang rocked up and they had to team up to overwhelm these.
O’Neill was on a roll. Myra wanted the two major biker gangs in Hub City take over policing, to make the streets safe, a temporary expedient until better arrangements could be made but one leader preferred to kill the other and split whilst the other gang arrive wanting revenge. It all ended pretty feebly and indeterminately in issue 30, and the letters page confirmed that the ongoing story started in issue 1 would end in issue 36, at which point it was anticipated that members of the creative team would leave and the question was whether to end the series there or continue. No points in guessing which way those dice will fall.
So the endgame began, with Myra the Mayor deciding to have the slum district of Hell’s Acres dynamited to the ground, ridding the city of both a drain on its resources, an eyesore and the symbol of Hub City’s decay. Not to mention the place Charles Victor Szazs grew up. Only a bunch of dealers protecting their turf kidnap Her Honour, inject her and intend to use her to stop the demolition, except that no-one knows she’s there, and Vic hides them in the underground water pipes to survive where, in circumstances completely conducive to romance, they have sex.
The next issue mixed up Myra’s introduction of Civilian Vigilance Groups with a traumatised Vietnam vet who ended up killing a kid in a flashback, the Mayor wanting to meet ‘Mr No-Face’ and The Question getting closer and closer to the edge of killing someone, just to see what it was like. But another one-off in issue 33, a complex story about someone corrupt wanting Myra dead and The Question being too weak to save her whilst a silent mechanical genius hunchback from Gotham City did gave off the impression of wheels spinning. And termination with issue 36 had now been confirmed. Not falling sales, my arse.
Things got no better when issue 34, inked by Carlos Garzan, started with four obvious pages of guilt dream, followed by somebody mysterious taking down Sage and pages of even more tedious dreams from him. Myra calls on a psychiatrist who dopes her up, quizzes her about her love-life and threatens to rape her until she, despite being doped, punches his lights out and goes home, where the issue ends with her getting a visit from Richard Dragon. And about time because the series is hurtling out of control by now and needs a bloody serious handbrake turn.
The penultimate issue featured one of the thugs who’d stripped and beaten Sage sticking The Question’s mask on with aeroplane glue and going out robbing and killing, Izzy O’Toole the former bad cop going after him, intent on killing him then reverting to the bad, killing him and discovering it’s a petty crook. Meanwhile Richard Dragon leads Myra to where the battered Sage has holed up, having more dreams of the psychologically banal, and Vic coming up with the ideal solution: he and Myra should leave Hub City.
Will they? Won’t they? Issue 36 would, I hoped, make everything clear. Actually, the end came as more of a relief than a conclusion. Hub City finally came to a dead stop. Vic decided to get out. He persuaded Myra, who’d told him she loved him, in his sleep, and recognised him as The Question, to go with him. On the way to the helicopter arranged by Richard, she collected her handicapped daughter Jackie from the Orphanage, which had finally run out of everything. Lady Siva arrived on the helicopter and, as any moderately well-read reader had known from the moment Myra saw those helpless kids, the Mayor decided her duty as the Mayor, and her honour as a person, demanded that she stay. She told Vic she loved him, when he was awake this time. As he flew off, he cried.
So the series was over. It wasn’t supposed to be. The proximate Green Arrow Annual 3 guest-starred The Question and acted as a bridge to O’Neill and Cowan’s The Question Quarterly, which lasted five issues, each featuring a complete 48 page story. I don’t have access to these but Sage finally kills someone in the first issue, and Myra’s daughter dies later on, whilst Myra never returns so I will not bother.
The Question was batted about here and there. Rick Veitch completely revamped the character in a contemptible manner in a 2005 mini-series – I may not have liked O’Neill’s treatment but he didn’t fuck the character over that disgracefully – and DC killed him off with cancer during the year-long 52, replacing him with Renee Montoya.
But the final word goes to issue 37, one of the Blackest Night spin-offs. This was written by Denny O’Neill with Greg Rucka and Denys Cowan pencils. It’s only the second of these Blackest Night one-more-issue stories that I’ve read and it’s so similar to Starman 81 in basic structure that I conclude they were written to a formula, and not an interesting one at that so it can go unsummarised.
I’m no longer surprised when my opinion of something that’s been highly acclaimed turns out to be radically different. It would be convenient to find myself running with the crowd more often but I don’t think I’m going to change any time now. No, obviously, I didn’t like The Question and my decision to drop it after at most two issues was well-taken. I found the philosophy shallow and unconvincing, and ultimately The Question failed on his own terms. The series’ fabled post-Watchmen grittiness rapidly became an endless, joyless wallow in ordure of the worst kind: a shock from a writer such as Denny O’Neill. That it lasted three years is something of a surprise. I’m glad to put it behind me. I want something better and more inspiring next.